Ahmadinejad: Be assured that the US and Israel will soon end lives
Yaakov Lappin
Published:
01.23.07, 22:24
Israel and the United States will soon be destroyed, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday during a meeting with Syria's foreign minister, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) website said in a report.
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad… assured that the United States and the Zionist regime of Israel will soon come to the end of their lives," the Iranian president was quoted as saying.
"Sparking discord among Muslims, especially between the Shiites and Sunnis, is a plot hatched by the Zionists and the US for dominating regional nations and looting their resources," Ahmadinejad added, according to the report.
The Iranian president also directly tied events in Lebanon to a wider plan aimed at Israel's destruction. He called on "regional countries" to "support the Islamic resistance of the Lebanese people and strive to enhance solidarity and unity among the different Palestinian groups in a bid to pave the ground for the undermining of the Zionist regime whose demise is, of course, imminent."
Ahmadinejad has threatened the State of Israel with annihilation several times in recent months, and has recently added the US and Britain to the list of countries he says will be destroyed.
Syria's Foreign Minister, Wailed Mualem, accused the US of attempting to carry out a "massacre of Muslims" and of sowing "discord among Islamic faiths in the region."
Mualem called on "regional states to pave the ground for the establishment of peace and tranquillity… while preventing further genocide of the Muslims," the IRIB website said.
Ah, he's at it again. The esteemed President of Iran is fortelling the destruction of America and Israel- still.
Has he qualified for Mullah status yet?
In other news, sweeps in LA netted over 750 illegal aliens. Of the 761, over 400 have already been deported. Can you say progress?
Liz Cheney is speaking out about Hilary Clinton and the war in general. Let me tell you, my jaw dropped when I read this.
Retreat Isn't an Option
By Liz CheneyTuesday, January 23, 2007; A17
Sen. Hillary Clinton declared this weekend, " I'm in to win." Anyone who has watched her remarkable trajectory can have no doubt that she'll do whatever it takes to win the presidency. I wish she felt the same way about the war.
In fairness, Clinton, with her proposal for arbitrary caps on troop levels and hemming and hawing about her vote for the war resolution, has company on both sides of the aisle. Sen. Joseph Lieberman is the only national Democrat showing any courage on this issue. We Republicans -- with help from senators such as Chuck Hagel -- seem ready to race the Democrats to the bottom.
I'd like to ask the politicians in both parties who are heading for the hills to stop and reflect on these basic facts:
· We are at war. America faces an existential threat. This is not, as Speaker Nancy Pelosi has claimed, a "situation to be solved." It would be nice if we could wake up tomorrow and say, as Sen. Barack Obama suggested at a Jan. 11 hearing, "Enough is enough." Wishing doesn't make it so. We will have to fight these terrorists to the death somewhere, sometime. We can't negotiate with them or "solve" their jihad. If we quit in Iraq now, we must get ready for a harder, longer, more deadly struggle later.
· Quitting helps the terrorists. Few politicians want to be known as spokesmen for retreat. Instead we hear such words as "redeployment," "drawdown" or "troop cap." Let's be clear: If we restrict the ability of our troops to fight and win this war, we help the terrorists. Don't take my word for it. Read the plans of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman Zawahiri to drive America from Iraq, establish a base for al-Qaeda and spread jihad across the Middle East. The terrorists are counting on us to lose our will and retreat under pressure. We're in danger of proving them right.
· Beware the polls. In November the American people expressed serious concerns about Iraq (and about Republican corruption and scandals). They did not say that they want us to lose this war. They did not say that they want us to allow Iraq to become a base for al-Qaeda to conduct global terrorist operations. They did not say that they would rather we fight the terrorists here at home. Until you see a poll that asks those questions, don't use election results as an excuse to retreat.
· Retreat from Iraq hurts us in the broader war. We are fighting the war on terrorism with allies across the globe, leaders such as Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan and Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan. Brave activists are also standing with us, fighting for freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the empowerment of women. They risk their lives every day to defeat the forces of terrorism. They can't win without us, and many of them won't continue to fight if they believe we're abandoning them. Politicians urging America to quit in Iraq should explain how we win the war on terrorism once we've scared all of our allies away.
What about Iran? There is no doubt that an American retreat from Iraq will embolden Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, making it even less likely that the Iranian president will bend to the will of the international community and halt his nuclear weapons program.
A member of Lebanon's parliament recently told me that Lebanese Sunnis, Shiites and Christians are lining up with Iran and Syria to fight against Sunnis, Shiites and Christians who want to stand with America. When I asked him why people were lining up with Iran and Syria, he said, "Because they know Iran and Syria aren't going anyplace. We're not so sure about America."
· Our soldiers will win if we let them. Read their blogs. Talk to them. They know that free people must fight to defend their freedom. No force on Earth -- especially not an army of terrorists and insurgents -- can defeat our soldiers militarily. American troops will win if we show even one-tenth the courage here at home that they show every day on the battlefield. And by the way, you cannot wish failure on our soldiers' mission and claim, at the same time, to be supporting the troops. It just doesn't compute.
I suppose Hillary Clinton's announcement was a sign of progress. In 2007, a woman can run for president and show the same level of courage and conviction about this war many of her male colleagues have. Steel in the spine? Not so much.
America deserves better. It's time for everyone -- Republicans and Democrats -- to stop trying to find ways for America to quit. Victory is the only option. We must have the fortitude and the courage to do what it takes. In the words of Winston Churchill, we must deserve victory.
We must be in it to win.
Hear, hear, Ms. Cheney, I don't think I could have said it better myself!
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
Saturday, January 20, 2007
The ACLU's Plan to save the guilty.
With the announcement for plans to collect the DNA of illegal aliens, terrorism detainees and those charged but not convicted of federal crimes, the ACLU and EPIC moves to action.
Their cause? Defend the guilty from being databased. Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Sen. Jon Kyl are the major proponents of the bill.
Currently, the FBI's CODIS (Combined DNA Indexing System) is the only DNA database available. The ACLU has jumped on the bill, which is still in it's rough stage, decrying it as invasive. Their main objection? If you happen to be singled out for an airport inspection, you might be added to the database. If you're chosen at a border checkpoint, you might be added to the database. This is too much of a risk to take. We can't take massive steps to protect our borders without possibly stepping on the toes of our spoiled and guilty minded public.
Out of 100 illegal aliens arrested, 70% will be rearrested. The rise of diseases such as leprosey, smallpox, scarlet fever and malaria are on the rise. We're being bled dry by the illegals that come to America and have their babies. Babies which become citizens, thus entitled to the benefits of welfare and tax payer support.
Terrorism has proven over and over that it has no other agenda but to destroy America.
Why on earth would a group called the American Civil Liberties Union want to defend the 'rights' of people that are on the verge of killing everything we stand for and love?
Why not just elimiate AFIS and NCIC as well? Are we wrong to take steps to label criminals and terrorists?
Their cause? Defend the guilty from being databased. Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Sen. Jon Kyl are the major proponents of the bill.
Currently, the FBI's CODIS (Combined DNA Indexing System) is the only DNA database available. The ACLU has jumped on the bill, which is still in it's rough stage, decrying it as invasive. Their main objection? If you happen to be singled out for an airport inspection, you might be added to the database. If you're chosen at a border checkpoint, you might be added to the database. This is too much of a risk to take. We can't take massive steps to protect our borders without possibly stepping on the toes of our spoiled and guilty minded public.
Out of 100 illegal aliens arrested, 70% will be rearrested. The rise of diseases such as leprosey, smallpox, scarlet fever and malaria are on the rise. We're being bled dry by the illegals that come to America and have their babies. Babies which become citizens, thus entitled to the benefits of welfare and tax payer support.
Terrorism has proven over and over that it has no other agenda but to destroy America.
Why on earth would a group called the American Civil Liberties Union want to defend the 'rights' of people that are on the verge of killing everything we stand for and love?
Why not just elimiate AFIS and NCIC as well? Are we wrong to take steps to label criminals and terrorists?
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Eh, missing me yet? I realized yesterday that I haven't addressed the new Iraq strategy that President Bush outlined last week.. perhaps it was two weeks ago, the days tend to run together.
He's sending 20, 000 more troops over there. I do agree with this plan, my only qualm is that there is no increase in the bombing raids. This is due to, of course, the large presence of American and Coalition forces in country.
I believe that was one of our large errors in the onset of the war. During the first Gulf War, bombing runs were conducted around the clock. Giving the Republican Guard and the Iraqi Army little chance to regroup.
This time around, there wasn't (in my opinion) nearly enough strafing runs to break up the pockets of resistance. Fallujah, Tikrit, Baghdad, Mosul, all of these towns should have been bombed regularly for a week.
Drive the resistance underground, or better yet, destroy it and you have less opposition when the ground troops go in.
Yes, I know about collateral damage, I know that innocents die, and frankly, I wish it would never happen.
But unfortunately, it does. People do die. It happens to be a fact of life, you live, then you die.
Anyway, back to my original topic. 20,000 more troops, Good. More funding, very good.
His only opposition there is going to be his Congress and House. Good luck with Pelosi, Mr President.
What I found ironic is while he took the blame for all of the mistakes that happened. He didn't take the credit for all the good things that have happened.
Let's see, the Iraqi's are no longer oppressed by a dictator, have held democratic elections, have a President, a Constitution, and a myriad of other things.
Wonder who is responsible for all of that?
One person made the decision for that to become possible.
This man has been ridiculed, reviled, insulted, mocked, called names, been "disapproved of" and disrespected by millions. Yet, he is a hero in this day and age.
George W. Bush.
He's sending 20, 000 more troops over there. I do agree with this plan, my only qualm is that there is no increase in the bombing raids. This is due to, of course, the large presence of American and Coalition forces in country.
I believe that was one of our large errors in the onset of the war. During the first Gulf War, bombing runs were conducted around the clock. Giving the Republican Guard and the Iraqi Army little chance to regroup.
This time around, there wasn't (in my opinion) nearly enough strafing runs to break up the pockets of resistance. Fallujah, Tikrit, Baghdad, Mosul, all of these towns should have been bombed regularly for a week.
Drive the resistance underground, or better yet, destroy it and you have less opposition when the ground troops go in.
Yes, I know about collateral damage, I know that innocents die, and frankly, I wish it would never happen.
But unfortunately, it does. People do die. It happens to be a fact of life, you live, then you die.
Anyway, back to my original topic. 20,000 more troops, Good. More funding, very good.
His only opposition there is going to be his Congress and House. Good luck with Pelosi, Mr President.
What I found ironic is while he took the blame for all of the mistakes that happened. He didn't take the credit for all the good things that have happened.
Let's see, the Iraqi's are no longer oppressed by a dictator, have held democratic elections, have a President, a Constitution, and a myriad of other things.
Wonder who is responsible for all of that?
One person made the decision for that to become possible.
This man has been ridiculed, reviled, insulted, mocked, called names, been "disapproved of" and disrespected by millions. Yet, he is a hero in this day and age.
George W. Bush.
Thursday, January 4, 2007
Pat Robertson?
Nutjob or prophet of God?
As a religious person, I'm actually inclined to believe the former. Surprise, surprise.
As for an attack, if we continue on the way we're going, it very well could happen.
We've suspended legitimate, feasible ways of keeping our country safe, we allow national news media to continue to print Classified material, and we just put Nancy Pelosi in as Speaker of the House.
Sure, why not? It's an open invitation to any terrorist group to waltz in and work destruction.
We want to talk and negotiate with them, but what we do not realize is that there is no negotiating with radicals.
We talk, they laugh. Why waste your breath?
Although, for all of his inane rambling, Robertson has given one statement that I agree with..
Assassinate Hugo Chavez.
As a religious person, I'm actually inclined to believe the former. Surprise, surprise.
As for an attack, if we continue on the way we're going, it very well could happen.
We've suspended legitimate, feasible ways of keeping our country safe, we allow national news media to continue to print Classified material, and we just put Nancy Pelosi in as Speaker of the House.
Sure, why not? It's an open invitation to any terrorist group to waltz in and work destruction.
We want to talk and negotiate with them, but what we do not realize is that there is no negotiating with radicals.
We talk, they laugh. Why waste your breath?
Although, for all of his inane rambling, Robertson has given one statement that I agree with..
Assassinate Hugo Chavez.
Tuesday, January 2, 2007
Superficiality
I hope I'm spelling it correctly..lol.
Listening to my Ipod last night, I came across a song named "Gallery".
Lyrics following this diatribe.
I can't tell if he's jealous the other guy has the girl, or if he's truly upset that this guy uses girls then lets them go when he's finished.
Why does the girl stay with him for the money? If she's having thoughts about knowing she needs better, why is she there in the first place? Did she have second thoughts?
I guess my question this morning is, why do we place so much emphasis on money, looks, and everything superficial? It won't last. Money will run out, looks will grow old, and superficialness will fade. Things like Honor, love, sacrifice, devotion, and loyalty are things that do not fade.
Don't fall in love with someone just because they happen to be attractive or wealthy or dress well. Fall in love with the person that's on the inside.
God broke the mold,
When he made this one I know
She's breathtaking but so much more
She walks in the room, your lungs closed
Making you never want to breathe again
Her boyfriend has got so much dough
So much ice his neck and wrist froze Is he faithful to her? Hell no
But she chose to be with him, shorty
Tell me is the money worth your soul
Tell me what's the reason that you hold on
When you know that dude has a whole wall of 'em just like you
And girl you're just way too fine
Gotta be treated as one of a kindGirl use your mind
Don't be just another dime
Because I can't take
Seeing you with him'
Cuz I know exactly what you'll be,
In his gallery
It's just not fair
And it's tearing me apart
You're just another priceless work of art
In his gallery
She's so confused
She knows she deserves more
Someone who will love and adore
But his money's hard to ignore
She really doesn't know what to do
Girl it's just a matter of time
Before he finds another more fine
After he's done dulling your shine
You're out the door and he's through with you
Tell me is the money worth your soul
Tell me what's the reason that you hold on,
When you know that dude has a whole wall of 'em just like you
And girl you're just way too fine
Gotta be treated as one of a kind
Girl use your mind
Don't be just another dime
I can't take
Seeing you with him'
Cuz I know exactly what you'll be
In his gallery
It's just not fair
And it's tearing me apart
You're just another priceless work of art
In his gallery
You're a masterpiece
I know that he
Can't appreciate your beauty
Don't let him cheapen you
He don't see you like i do
Beautiful not just for show
Time that someone let you know
I can't take
Seeing you with him'
Cuz I know exactly what you'll be
In his gallery
It's just not fair
And it's tearing me apart
You're just another priceless work of art
Listening to my Ipod last night, I came across a song named "Gallery".
Lyrics following this diatribe.
I can't tell if he's jealous the other guy has the girl, or if he's truly upset that this guy uses girls then lets them go when he's finished.
Why does the girl stay with him for the money? If she's having thoughts about knowing she needs better, why is she there in the first place? Did she have second thoughts?
I guess my question this morning is, why do we place so much emphasis on money, looks, and everything superficial? It won't last. Money will run out, looks will grow old, and superficialness will fade. Things like Honor, love, sacrifice, devotion, and loyalty are things that do not fade.
Don't fall in love with someone just because they happen to be attractive or wealthy or dress well. Fall in love with the person that's on the inside.
God broke the mold,
When he made this one I know
She's breathtaking but so much more
She walks in the room, your lungs closed
Making you never want to breathe again
Her boyfriend has got so much dough
So much ice his neck and wrist froze Is he faithful to her? Hell no
But she chose to be with him, shorty
Tell me is the money worth your soul
Tell me what's the reason that you hold on
When you know that dude has a whole wall of 'em just like you
And girl you're just way too fine
Gotta be treated as one of a kindGirl use your mind
Don't be just another dime
Because I can't take
Seeing you with him'
Cuz I know exactly what you'll be,
In his gallery
It's just not fair
And it's tearing me apart
You're just another priceless work of art
In his gallery
She's so confused
She knows she deserves more
Someone who will love and adore
But his money's hard to ignore
She really doesn't know what to do
Girl it's just a matter of time
Before he finds another more fine
After he's done dulling your shine
You're out the door and he's through with you
Tell me is the money worth your soul
Tell me what's the reason that you hold on,
When you know that dude has a whole wall of 'em just like you
And girl you're just way too fine
Gotta be treated as one of a kind
Girl use your mind
Don't be just another dime
I can't take
Seeing you with him'
Cuz I know exactly what you'll be
In his gallery
It's just not fair
And it's tearing me apart
You're just another priceless work of art
In his gallery
You're a masterpiece
I know that he
Can't appreciate your beauty
Don't let him cheapen you
He don't see you like i do
Beautiful not just for show
Time that someone let you know
I can't take
Seeing you with him'
Cuz I know exactly what you'll be
In his gallery
It's just not fair
And it's tearing me apart
You're just another priceless work of art
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
