Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Welfare.

So. I do honestly hate taxes. I honestly do.

I despise working like a dog in order to support people that will not work.

I despise working like a dog so that people that aren't even legal citizens can have access to better healthcare and benefits than citizens.

An illegal can come to the US, have a baby, that baby in turn is a legal citizen. Yet, their illegal status deems them qualified for medical attention, money, groceries, etc.

Yet, only citizens that meet a certain requirement can have access to these benefit.

Where does the line between abuse and need blur? Where does the seperation occur? Oftentimes, it doesn't.

We have limits on the amount of daycare the government or rather taxpayers will pay. That doesn't stop people from living together and having a joint income. These people will have a maximum of 230$ a month to pay in childcare. That's one months worth of co-pay. When the average parent, not on welfare, will pay that in a week.

Yes, people that don't need it use it. People that are perfectly capable of working use it. People that have two incomes use it. Where do we stop the merry-go-round?

How much longer will I have to look at my check stub and sigh over the amount of money I gave to Social Security? Until something is done about the system, we simply have to do it.

Social Security is a Communist idea.

com·mu·nism (kmy-nzm) KEY NOUN:
A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.

Communism
A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.

The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.

Quote: "A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."

All goods are equally shared by the people..

So, is this what we are attempting to do? Let those that work support us all?

I think not.

No comments: